Special
Feature: Picturebook Reviews and Recommendations by Peter Neumeyer
AGE GUIDES: these are approximate recommendations:
Picturebooks, 3-6 years old (though often enjoyed by older children,
too)
REVIEWERS: Peter Neumeyer
* denotes San Diego writer and/or illustrator
** Age levels, when provided by the publishers, are included in
the bibliographical information. Otherwise, category placements
are our best approximations.
Picturebook Reviews and recommendations by Peter Neumeyer,
Professor Emeritus English Dept., SDSU; Founding Member,
National Center for the Study of Children’s Literature,
SDSU; Boston Globe book reviewer; author of The
Annotated Charlotte’s Web
Burton, Virginia Lee. The
Little House (board book). Houghton Mifflin
Harcourt, 2009, 1942. $7.99. Ages 3 to 6.
Carroll, Lewis, ill. Rodney Matthews. Alice
in Wonderland. Templar Books, an imprint of
Candlewick Press, 2009. $24.99. Ages 9 and up.
Field, Eugene W. ill. Giselle Potter. Wynken,
Blynken, and Nod. Schwartz and Wade Books,
2008. $16.99. Ages 3 to 7.
Williams, C. K., illustrated by Stephen Gammell.
How the Nobble was Finally Found.
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2009. $18.00. Ages 6 to 10.
Burton, Virginia Lee. The
Little House (board book). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt,
2009, 1942. $7.99. Ages 3 to 6.
McCloskey. Robert.
Make Way for Ducklings. Viking, 1941, 1969. $17.99.
Ages 4-8.
In the past couple of years, some fine books from the golden
years of the 1940's have been reissued, and so now we’re
blessed once again with two former Caldecott winners–Robert
McCloskey’s Make Way for Ducklings (1941)
and Virginia Lee Burton’s classic The Little House
(1942).
Robert McCloskey executed some grand historical murals for
the WPA, the blessed and sorely missed government program
that employed painters and writers in the 1930's, enriching
the artistic expression of this country in breadth, if not
always in depth, as never before or since. Perhaps from
experience rendering epic actions vividly on court house
walls, McCloskey became master of the telling gesture and
the fast and essential plot line. And so in Make Way
for the Ducklings he tells the mesmerizing mini-epic
of Mrs. Mallard. Having scouted out the congenial Boston
Garden lake, but finding the urban environs too chaotic
for brooding, she and her husband, Mr. Mallard, settle their
eight eggs on a small island in the nearby Charles River.
After eight ducklings have hatched, Mrs. Mallard, with help
of Michael, Clancy, and four more Boston traffic cops, single
file back to the Boston Garden, where henceforth they settle
on a little island on the lake, and follow the Swan boats
and eat the peanuts tossed at them. So famous do they become
that by now McCloskey’s fictionalized ducklings have
become immortalized as bronze statuary greeting the visitors
to The Garden.
McCloskey’s mastery of unambiguous expression and
gesture, even in a duck, make for uproarious humor in the
world of a preschooler, and for nostalgic reminiscence in
the mind of reading parent. Make Way for Ducklings should
indeed be reintroduced to each generation of American children.
Virginia Lee Burton’s The Little House (1942
Caldecott winner) may be about the shapeliest illustrated
story ever devised for the very small. The book, including
this slightly smaller board version, is written and designed
as one artistic whole–what the Bayreuth Richard Wagner
aficionados call a Gesammtkunstwerk–a work
of art in which text and illustration echo each other in
tone and mood, from the plot itself all the way down to
color, line, and angle.
In short, the Little House, animated with windows for eyes
and the front stairs as mouth, watches the seasons pass.
Then, sometime in the 19th century, a family with children
moves in. The family is active and happy, and the house
smiles as trees grow in the countryside, life flourishes,
and the seasons turn. As time passes, more people arrive,
but now no longer in horse-drawn carriages, but in automobiles.
A steam shovel digs up the soil, other houses are built,
the years pass and the houses now become multi-story tenements.
The originally merry colors become murky, brown and gray,
and the stars once seen in the night sky are now obliterated
as the air is filled with dust and smoke, and gray-black
rail lines bisect the page. The little house is crowded
between high-rises, scrunched under the tracks, broken windowed
and now distinctly no longer smiling with its front porch.
The seasons follow one-another, Spring comes again, and
now along comes the great-great-granddaughter of the man
who first built the Little House. The little house reminds
her of stories she had heard–she learns it’s
the house her grandmother had lived in. She buys it again,
and the Little House is loaded onto a trailer and again
hauled out into the countryside–where the sky is yellow-gold,
the trees are in blossom, and the grass is green. Once again,
children are playing, the leaves blow, the sun and the moon
which we had first seen in the opening pages once more go
through their cycles, and on the last page, the Little House
sleeps contentedly on the round earth, under the vault of
the night sky.
Even the text follows the music as, in the opening and closing
pages it seems to adapt itself more gracefully to the curvature
that, for Burton, signifies all things wholesome, feminine,
life-giving, generative, as against the staccato angularity
of the urban dissonance of the book’s middle.
The Little House seems a fine choice for the board
book medium, for it is a book worth reading and rereading,
a book worth growing into, if we accept the sensible postulate
of John Locke, that early aesthetical impression quite literally
will make its mark on a child and leave a lasting inclination
for The Good.
Carroll, Lewis, ill.
Rodney Matthews. Alice in Wonderland. Templar Books,
an imprint of Candlewick Press, 2009. $24.99. Ages 9 and
up.
Ever since the original copyright expired in 1907, a sort
of ultimate task that illustrators have set as a test for
themselves is to do the pictures for Lewis Carroll’s
Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland (1865).
From the beginning, they have felt it difficult to escape
from the inspired influence of the original illustrator,
John Tenniel, who so brilliantly set the bar very high–so
high, in fact, that because of Tenniel’s dissatisfaction
with the printing, Carroll, had the entire first edition
scrapped. At the time of composition, Carroll, or by his
proper name, Lewis Dodgson, had executed his own engaging
illustrations for the companion volume, Alice’s
Adventures Under Ground, which he intended to give
personally to Alice Liddell, the little girl who had been
the occasion for the original telling, and who had been
the model for Alice in the story, if actually not for the
illustrations.
Illustrating “Alice” challenges artists in the
same way that scaling Anapurna beckons mountain climbers.
Among the most famous illustrators, we count Arthur Rackham
(1907) and Mervyn Peake (1947) in Great Britain, and in
America, Willy Pogany (1929), a limited edition by Salvador
Dali (1969), and a startling and at times thoroughly frightening
one by Barry Moser in 1982. For that matter, a number of
the editions, such as Ralph Steadman’s 1973 version,
are also frightening–perhaps for a reason not hard
to find. Depending on the perspective from which one approaches
the tale of Alice, and even depending somewhat on one’s
own natural disposition, the story itself of this venturesome
and outspoken little girl contains indubitable and explicit
terrors. The aplomb with which brave young Alice faces down
these terrors is distinctly a part of her memorable persona.
It’s one of the reasons she is an admirable heroine.
Comes now another new edition elegantly boxed, but once
again mistitled Alice in Wonderland, illustrated
by the British commercial artist and science fiction and
fantasy illustrator, Rodney Matthews, whose monstrous shapes
for the creatures Alice encounters bespeak the artist’s
own early inclination to science. The forms and shapes that
Matthews has summoned up are profoundly threatening in their
nightmarish evocations and their fecund organicism. That’s
not bad in this instance, for the book could suggest as
much. And living in a world of such terrors may well account
for the hollow-eyed and emaciated state of Matthews’s
rendition of Alice. In a brief foreword, Mathews acknowledges
the influence of Walt Disney, and alerts us to the fact
that here, in his own version, Matthews has ingeniously
moved between scenes viewed “macro” and in “telephoto.”
Along with the Disney influence, one may certainly find
intimations of Bruegel or the 15th century virtuoso of horrific
apparitions, Hieronimus Bosch. Indubitably the perception
of Alice’s world by Matthews is eminently skilled,
plausible, and worthy, if not exactly charming. And the
original text of Lewis Carroll’s early monument in
the field of nonsense fiction is retained intact in this
volume. So, if you already own one edition featuring the
original 1865 Tenniel woodcuts, this new version by Rodney
Matthews could well become another item in your collection
of “Alices.”
Field,
Eugene W. ill. Giselle Potter. Wynken, Blynken, and
Nod. Schwartz and Wade Books, 2008. $16.99. Ages 3
to 7.
If it is still your hope that you may lull a child to sleep
with honeyed bedtime susurrations from a book, you may be
a likely consumer of Giselle Potter’s engaging new
illustrations for Eugene W. Field’s 120-year-old bedtime
fantasy, Wynken, Blynken, and Nod. Evocatively,
even mystically, illustrated, the story lends itself to
lands between sleeping and waking. The mysterious narrator
(who could be, but is not necessarily, the “mother”)
explains that the eponymous protagonists are, in fact, “two
little eyes”–Wynken, Blynken–and the “little
head” is Nod. These three characters sail off one
night in a wooden shoe--actually, the “shoe”
is their “trundle bed,” the narrator explains–a
small bed on casters that can be rolled under another bed.
The charm and originality of the short poem lie in the romantic
imagery and the much more ambiguous notions that these images
may evoke. We actually see the river “of crystal light”
on which the children set forth, and we are told and shown
that it becomes a boundless “sea of dew.” The
suggestion that we are sailing into a dream is reinforced
by the trace of an actual gauzy night curtain that is echoed
in the sail of the wooden boat. At the same time, curiously,
the “herring“ that the three catch, we are also
told, are the night stars themselves–this strange
duplicity well captured here by the illustrator. And in
the morning, the little wooden boat is brought home from
its strange trip, “so pretty a sail....as if it could
not be.” But actually, the “pretty sail”
actually did happen, for here now lies the little boy in
his bed, clutching to himself one of the herring for which
the three had been fishing. Are the two herring in bed with
the boy his actual fish toys to accompany the toy elephant,
ball, and sail boat we’re looking at? Or are these
two herring magical mementoes actually retrieved from dream
voyage–as in Chris Van Allsburg’s The Polar
Express? Where did Wynken, Blynken, and Nod really
go–what, in fact, was this sea in the night where
“the herring” are the stars?
The story is stranger than, at first, it seems.
Sami, The Big, Bigger,
Biggest Book, Blue Apple Books, 2008. $14.95. Ages
2-5.
So much for two gems from the golden 1940's. A contemporary
book that most successfully replicates the thoughtful design
of those years is Sami’s Big, Bigger, Biggest,
a wonder of folding and unfolding paper which, in curious
metaphorical fashion, echoes the conceptual unfolding that
transpires in a three-year-old brain. In bright, bold colors,
with a retro font and illustrations evocative of the past,
each page unfolds to picture, first, the normative ideas,
“far,” “fast,” “deep,”
“long,” etc. Then, if you unfold the flaps,
each page will reveal the comparative–“farther,”
“farthest,” or “faster,” “fastest.”
Harriet Ziefert’s sparse text, provides a logical
but unobtrusive scaffold for bold-colored, dynamic illustrations
giving the sharp edged illusion of collage. “Long,”
“longer,” “longest,” is rendered
with a beautifully stylized, knock-your-eyes-out red fire
truck #5, from which three (mixed ethnic) fire fighters
unroll a bright yellow hose, which, of course, illustrates
its extension with each fold-over flap. For other comparison,
the seemingly-simple interplay of the pages is, in fact,
remarkably artful, so that, for example, “short,”
shorter, “shortest,” are three increasingly
diminutive human figures in fold-outs, while the verso (back
pages) of the foldout make their own reverse commentary
in numbers.
It looks so simple! But in fact, the book is a brilliant
mini-construction of color and spatial ingenuity. Just try
(I did!) making a folded paper version of a book like this
yourself.
Schallau,
David. Come Back Soon. Houghton Mifflin Books for
Children, 2009. $17.00. Ages 6 to 10.
From Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels,
to Jean De Brunhoff’s The Story of Babar,
or Frank L. Baum’s The Wonderful Wizard of Oz,
or Dino Buzzati’s The Bears’ Famous Invasionof Sicily, and Tove Jansson’s Moominland,
entire fictional universes, made to scale and complete in
every detail, have been created by daring writers. Now comes
Daniel Schallau, whose country of Icetown in Come Back
Soon warrants inclusion in any inventory of great lands
of the literary imagination. For me, Come Back Soon
is the high point of this picture book season.
Icetown, a land inhabited by penguins, is an imposing architectural
fantasy, splendid with a new ice hotel, designed in all
its elaborate detail by Elephant, “Architect L.L.P.”
( i.e. Limited Liability Partnership).” Mayor Guin
(all penguins share the common surname, Guin) and the inhabitants
of the snow metropolis have invited Elephant back to celebrate
his creation. The invitations go out by fishmail and are
delivered worldwide by “postwhales.”
Schallau has devised a penguin land of almost infinite detail
and variety, in which the pachydermal architect, after his
long sea voyage, is invited out for sushi by his grateful
clients. As in the rest of this deceptively simple, actually
extremely complex, book, every architectural detail, and
every little penguin who may have appeared earlier in the
book, persists in its own designated place, to render its
own contribution to the intricate whole. In the sushi parlor,
the penguins sit on their individual stools, whereas mammoth
Elephant necessarily occupies two at once. On the wall hang
the parlor’s fishy offerings—salmon,
tuna, plankton, dumplings, squid, and all else you could
imagine. And because this sushi parlor is at the “bottom”
of the world, the covers for the lanterns on the ceiling
appropriately sport images of the earth viewed “upside
down,” as though you were looking up from the space
below the Antarctic, the planet spinning topsy-turvy above
you.
After Elephant and attending penguins bed down for the night,
in the underwater portion of the island, a merry and cosmopolitan
nightlife continues, even as whales drift in and out of
openings, stopping for refreshments at “whale stops,”
and float away with loads of squid and tuna.
In the morning, Elephant and all the penguins wash faces
and brush tusks. Then, as he’s riding the giant snowball
that’s the preferred mode of transportation, things
suddenly go awry for Elephant. The snowball goes haywire,
and Elephant plows into the penguin-shaped top of the hotel,
which breaks off, and elephant and snowball and hotel top
are adrift at sea. In less than a week, however, with all
the penguins harmoniously mobilized and the architect doing
his part, all is again rebuilt. Penguins present Elephant
with a giant snowball gift, and he sails for home, knowing
he is always welcome back in the land of the penguins.
In subtle fashion, the elaborate and crowded panorama of
Icetown and its inhabitants is duplicated and compounded
by the artist’s ingenious rendering of an entire secondary
universe, not only in the sub-aquatic elaborations of the
terrestrial world above, but also in the dancing shadows—icy
blue in penguin-land—which, as in some Platonic
cave parable, are cast not only on primary objects but against
the wintry sky itself.
It’s an ebullient story made even loopier by the elaborate
paintings which, if you really take the trouble to work
out the geography and topography and perspective, will reward
you with a coherent understanding of this kindly and intricate
land dreamed up in its creator’s exuberant imagination.
Not least among its features, like all the great literary
alternative civilizations I’ve cited at the outset,
Come Back Soon does not take place in a societal
vacuum. Relationships among fellow creatures in David Schallau’s
mini-panorama display a distinguishing civil courtesy and
rationality that suggests itself as a norm for thriving
commerce in a modern land.
Clip-Clop
is that distinguished thing, the exemplary picture book
that lulls the unknowing reader astray by its syncopated
perfection, seemingly simply, yet in fact exhibiting a complex
dance of story, illustration, and typography. The book evolves
in three simple actions: there’s Mr. Horse, and then
there’s cat, dog, pig, and duck, each of which, in
sequence, wants to go for a ride on the horse. By mid-book
they’re all on top of Mr. Horse, who is galloping
faster and faster–going from “Clip-Clop”
to "Clippity-cloppity” till all the riders yell
“Whoa! Stop!” and Horse skids to a halt and
all the riders sail off into a hay stack. Mr. Horse expresses
some concern, but cat, dog, pig, and duck cry AGAIN in loud
bold capital letters, and off they go again, cat, dog, pig,
and duck, “Clip-clop, clippity-clop!” What could
be a bigger thrill. My enthusiasm is unabated.
Williams, C. K., illustrated by
Stephen Gammell. How the Nobble was Finally Found.
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2009. $18.00. Ages 6 to 10.
Pulitzer Prize winning poet, C. K.
Williams and Caldecott winner, Stephen Gammell make a formidable
team as they create the fantastical little “something,”
the Nobble–an airy creature who plays in snowflakes
and naps on the bottom rung of the number eight. Even though
the Nobble is over 4,000 years old, he has never bumped
into anybody else at all, and nobody has ever found him
since he loiters in such unlikely places as the space between
Wednesday and Thursday. So the Nobble is lonely, and he
cries in his sleep, and sometimes wonders whether he might
not just be himself having a dream about himself. And he
thinks maybe in another dream he’d be somebody who
didn’t live quite as much alone as now he did.
When the Nobble ventures forth into our world, he encounters
great square boxes–buildings–and scary noise
making creatures–dogs and cats–and then, of
all things, a little girl–a little girl who shouts
at him “why don’t you pick up the phone?”
And that’s where this book becomes different, magical,
and in a class by itself. This magic lies in the language,
the off-base originality–why would the girl want to
talk to Nobble on a phone? And when the Nobble hears himself
knocking at the door, what he says is “Where when”
or “How so?” or “Is why?”
The little girl introduces the Nobble to another Nobble
and the two are delighted to discover one-another. The meeting
marks an end to their loneliness, and they’re grateful
to the little girl–but now they want to depart, and
so what does one say when must leave someone else? Do you
say “How before” or “here when”
or “If whether”–no, the little girl tells
the two Nobbles, “just say ‘Goodbye’.”
And so both Nobbles say “Goodbye. Little girl,”
and then guess that what should follow is a greeting to
each other: “Hello Nobble,” and then the other
Nobble says “Hello Nobble, to you.” And once
author, Williams, is off on one of these crazy riffs of
linguistic non-sequiturs, there’s no stopping him–and
the somewhat touching story of the Nobble becomes poetry.
Nonsense poetry, but clearly, poetry, which in genuine form
may be just about the rarest genre in children’s books
today.
Five thumbs up for the Nobble, who lives in the illustrator’s
ink-spattered and wildly propelled Gamellian universe. Runny
paint, splashes and splotches, scruffy-headed creatures–these
could all be unsettling, except that the inherent sweetness
of the Nobbles themselves makes their bug-eyed, not really
human, oddity somehow, in spite of themselves, quite endearing.